NPA chairman Ian Strachan has justified the decision of the NPA to withdraw from Pharmacy Voice by saying that “pursuing unity and a single voice [in pharmacy] is fine but not if the price of that unity compromises our ability to defend the interests of independents, particularly when the threat of the Government’s measures will affect independents the most.”

He told Sigma delegates that, in his view, it was difficult to achieve aligned agendas and shared values [within Pharmacy Voice]. “I would rather lobby from outside the establishment and influence politicians and civil servants without the handicap of that illusion of unity sometimes.”

It is not personal, Mr Strachan said, but the scale of the threat to the sector is so fundamental to its future that “we haven’t time to get things wrong”. Pharmacy policy development should sit within the negotiating umbrella and, as far as the Government’s reforms are concerned, “I would rather have no policy than bad policy”.

Originally Published by Pharmacy Magazine

We Recommend

Recognition of Excellence Awards

The Recognition of Excellence Awards 2016, hosted by Training Matters, will take place on the 30 June, in London

PGEU joins call for health profession exemption from new legislation

The PGEU has called for an exemption for health professionals from a proposal that states should justify new professiona...

Popular Features

What would you like to see your PMR system do?

P3 asks pharmacists what would they like to see their PMR system do?

Networking for success

Get out and network: the key to growing your influence

Increase in sporting injuries

With more and more people doing sport, and in turn more injuries, what can pharmacy do to help?